Settlement ranges for shoulder injuries and how the numbers are built.
Rotator cuff tears, dislocations, and labrum injuries all fall under this page, and insurers tend to scrutinize them more than they scrutinize a knee or back claim, because shoulder pain is harder to see on a quick exam and easier to dismiss without imaging. Here's what actually moves the number on this site's calculator.
The first question an adjuster asks is whether imaging confirms structural damage, a torn rotator cuff or labrum shows up clearly on MRI, while a strain or bruise usually doesn't. The second question is whether the injury restricts overhead motion or lifting in a way a physical therapist or orthopedist has documented; a shoulder that "hurts" is a much weaker claim than a shoulder with a measured, recorded loss of range of motion. Any delay between the accident and your first shoulder-specific appointment gets flagged, since insurers use it to argue the injury either wasn't caused by the incident or wasn't serious enough to seek prompt care.
| Severity tier | Multiplier | Typical shoulder injury example |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate | 2.5× | Strain or minor impingement, resolves with therapy |
| This page's default | 2.8× | Shoulder injury claims generally, per this site's convention |
| Serious | 3.5× | Arthroscopic surgery for a confirmed tear |
| Severe | 4.5× | Documented permanent loss of range of motion or strength |
The injury claim calculator adds your medical bills and lost wages to the multiplier result. A prior shoulder injury at the same joint is the complication insurers raise most often here, similar to how a knee claim gets challenged over pre-existing arthritis.
A negative or ambiguous MRI weakens the claim's medical support, but it doesn't end it. Documented pain, restricted range of motion, and a consistent treatment history can still support a claim even without a clear structural finding.
Both are treated similarly on this site's scale since both are objective, imaging-confirmed injuries; the actual multiplier depends more on treatment path, whether surgery was needed, and documented lasting impact, than on which specific structure was torn.
A first-time dislocation without a structural tear often resolves faster and settles toward the lower end of the range, while a dislocation that damages the labrum or causes recurring instability moves the claim higher.
Because it's a concrete, measurable limitation that ties directly to daily and occupational function, a physical therapist's measured range-of-motion loss is harder to dispute than a subjective pain complaint.
Not inherently, but it can face more skepticism since shoulder pain doesn't always show visibly the way a limp or a cast does, which makes consistent imaging and treatment documentation especially important.

Priya Raman would rather cite the source than repeat a number someone else invented, which is why every multiplier on this site links back to how it's actually applied.